Football is war. That is, if war is fought neither with weapons nor illegal crackback blocks.
And football kills people, about 13 per year since the early '80s. And the brain trauma that results, not from big, catastropic hits, but thousands of little ones on every play from scrimmage over the course of a career, has gotten recent attention from media, academia, and even Congress.
This is serious. When it becomes apparent that everyone playing football suffers serious brain injuries, the status quo becomes unacceptable. No tinkering of the rule book can save the players. Only a dramatic change will reduce the debilitation that comes from years of head-blows. The Wall Street Journal suggests just banning helmets:
One of the strongest arguments for banning helmets comes from the Australian Football League. While it's a similarly rough game, the AFL never added any of the body armor Americans wear. When comparing AFL research studies and official NFL injury reports, AFL players appear to get hurt more often on the whole with things like shoulder injuries and tweaked knees. But when it comes to head injuries, the helmeted NFL players are about 25% more likely to sustain one.
Andrew McIntosh, a researcher at Australia's University of New South Wales who analyzed videotape, says there may be a greater prevalence of head injuries in the American game because the players hit each other with forces up to 100% greater. "If they didn't have helmets on, they wouldn't do that," he says. "They know they'd injure themselves."
The NFL point spread on the match-up between virtual safety and the real safety is about -15 1/2 in favor of virtual safety. Not only do helmets make players look and feel safer, they provide the bone-crunching hits that are such a visceral part of the game's thrill.
Additionally, they provide an essential element of the sport's look and feel. Football helmets just make one team look really different from the other, and they stand as a fundamental symbol of a team's character. Just look at a site like the Helmet Project to see what a helmet's aesthetic design can mean to fans.
Among the many failings of the new UFL, besides being so badly marketed that one suspects a The Producers-style boondoggle, is its decision to make all teams' uniforms and helmets look the same with different colors. Without differentiated helmets, the teams all seem to be of the league, not of the communities in which they play. Imagine if the Cowboys and the Redskins had the same owners, and wore essentially the same uniforms. NFL fans might as well surrender all their loyalties, and trade in their ESPN for BetUS sports book.
Meanwhile, over at FastCompany.com (where I go for all my sports fashion information) design blogger Ken Carbone has radically reimagined what he sees as the three worst helmets in the NFL -- the Redskins', the Buccaneers', and the Patriots'. (As a designer in the age of Apple, his bias is simplicity, which favors the Cowboys' Lone Star, the Browns' baby poop, and -- inexplicably -- the Bengals' irradiated space carrot.)
His Redskins' and Bucs' redesigns are actually pretty cool, and you should check them out. But his vision for a new Pats' helmet that would "really play the patriotic card"?
Oy vey. Where I have we seen this before?
Oh, that's right...
Born to be wild, baby!!! If helmets are just going to be fashion accessories, then teams should really work it. Now can we get that noble savage off the Skins' helmet?
***
Full disclosure: Although this post was written from the heart, the "point spreads" and "sports book" links in the text are from a paid sponsor, BetUS Sports Book. Thank you for your understanding.




Recent Comments